Sudan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2

Sudan
222,804
in 2015
Tanzania, United Republic of
224,994
in 2015
Sudan rank
9th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
8th

GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2 over time

  • Sudan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199020022015

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 224,994 against 222,804 in Sudan, a difference of 2,190.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sudan ahead.

Sudan ranks 9th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 8th of 202 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 265,645 244,133 21,512 Sudan
2000s 295,942 249,233 46,709 Sudan
2010s 271,430 226,012 45,418 Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - co2, Sudan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 224,994 against 222,804 in Sudan as of 2015.
What is the difference in ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - co2 between Sudan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
2,190, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Sudan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for ghg emissions from food systems, by gas (mt co2 eq) - co2?
Sudan ranks 9th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 8th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/ghg-emissions-from-food-systems-by-gas-mt-co2-eq-co2/sudan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/ghg-emissions-from-food-systems-by-gas-mt-co2-eq-co2/sudan/tanzania/">Sudan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GHG emissions from food systems, by gas (Mt CO2 eq) - CO2
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,304 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

GHG emissions from food systems disaggregated by gas are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).