Honduras vs Slovenia: Free and fair elections

Honduras
1
in 2025
Slovenia
1
in 2025
Honduras rank
1st
Slovenia rank
1st

Free and fair elections over time

  • Honduras
  • Slovenia
00.20.40.60.81183919322025

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 1 against 1 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 127 shared years of data; in 1867 it was Slovenia ahead.

Honduras ranks 1st and Slovenia ranks 1st of 172 countries.

Across the 17 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 3 and Slovenia in 12.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Slovenia Difference Ahead
1860s 0 1 1 Slovenia
1870s 0 1 1 Slovenia
1880s 0 1 1 Slovenia
1890s 0 1 1 Slovenia
1900s 0 1 1 Slovenia
1910s 0.3333 0.8889 0.5556 Slovenia
1920s 0.8 1 0.2 Slovenia
1930s 0.3333 1 0.6667 Slovenia
1940s 0 0.2857 0.2857 Slovenia
1950s 0.4286 0 0.4286 Honduras
1960s 0 0 0
1970s 1 0 1 Honduras
1980s 1 0 1 Honduras
1990s 1 1 0
2000s 0.9 1 0.1 Slovenia
2010s 0.4 1 0.6 Slovenia
2020s 0.8333 1 0.1667 Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections, Honduras or Slovenia?
Honduras, at 1 against 1 in Slovenia as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections between Honduras and Slovenia?
0, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Slovenia?
127 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2025.
How do Honduras and Slovenia rank globally for free and fair elections?
Honduras ranks 1st and Slovenia ranks 1st of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and fair elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and fair elections
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
172 places, 17,000 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether national elections were free and fair or not.