Tunisia vs Zambia: Free and Fair Elections Index

Tunisia
0.445
in 2025
Zambia
0.461
in 2025
Tunisia rank
101st
Zambia rank
98th

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Tunisia
  • Zambia
00.20.40.60.8178919072025

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.461 against 0.445 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.016.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Zambia ahead.

Tunisia ranks 101st and Zambia ranks 98th of 176 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 9.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia Zambia Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0 0.0649 0.0649 Zambia
1930s 0 0.1783 0.1783 Zambia
1940s 0 0.1727 0.1727 Zambia
1950s 0.0018 0.1818 0.18 Zambia
1960s 0.1019 0.24 0.1381 Zambia
1970s 0.0837 0.2395 0.1558 Zambia
1980s 0.067 0.257 0.19 Zambia
1990s 0.0766 0.4261 0.3495 Zambia
2000s 0.0665 0.4541 0.3876 Zambia
2010s 0.6697 0.4177 0.252 Tunisia
2020s 0.4485 0.404 0.0445 Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Tunisia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.461 against 0.445 in Tunisia as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Tunisia and Zambia?
0.016, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zambia?
115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
How do Tunisia and Zambia rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Tunisia ranks 101st and Zambia ranks 98th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.