Paraguay vs Ukraine: Free and Fair Elections Index

Paraguay
0.633
in 2025
Ukraine
0.604
in 2025
Paraguay rank
78th
Ukraine rank
80th

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Paraguay
  • Ukraine
00.20.40.6181119182025

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 0.633 against 0.604 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.029.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 80 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Ukraine ahead.

Paraguay ranks 78th and Ukraine ranks 80th of 176 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 3 and Ukraine in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Paraguay Ukraine Difference Ahead
1940s 0.0532 0.2505 0.1973 Ukraine
1950s 0.0429 0.2719 0.229 Ukraine
1960s 0.0407 0.19 0.1493 Ukraine
1970s 0.0409 0.2878 0.2469 Ukraine
1980s 0.0549 0.2999 0.245 Ukraine
1990s 0.4706 0.5898 0.1192 Ukraine
2000s 0.6106 0.4119 0.1987 Paraguay
2010s 0.6523 0.4397 0.2126 Paraguay
2020s 0.6358 0.6048 0.031 Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Paraguay or Ukraine?
Paraguay, at 0.633 against 0.604 in Ukraine as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Paraguay and Ukraine?
0.029, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Ukraine?
80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
How do Paraguay and Ukraine rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Paraguay ranks 78th and Ukraine ranks 80th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.