Niger vs South Sudan: Free and Fair Elections Index

Niger
0
in 2025
South Sudan
0
in 2025
Niger rank
157th
South Sudan rank
157th

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Niger
  • South Sudan
00.20.40.6182119232025

How they compare

Niger currently reports 0 against 0 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was South Sudan ahead.

Niger ranks 157th and South Sudan ranks 157th of 176 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 6 and South Sudan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger South Sudan Difference Ahead
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0.0198 0.0121 0.0077 Niger
1950s 0.0682 0.174 0.1058 South Sudan
1960s 0.2803 0.0199 0.2604 Niger
1970s 0.1015 0.1148 0.0133 South Sudan
1980s 0.0018 0.159 0.1572 South Sudan
1990s 0.3667 0.021 0.3457 Niger
2000s 0.5382 0.0551 0.4831 Niger
2010s 0.4974 0.0104 0.487 Niger
2020s 0.264 0 0.264 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Niger or South Sudan?
Niger, at 0 against 0 in South Sudan as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Niger and South Sudan?
0, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and South Sudan?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Niger and South Sudan rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Niger ranks 157th and South Sudan ranks 157th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.