Myanmar vs Somalia: Free and Fair Elections Index

Myanmar
0
in 2025
Somalia
0
in 2025
Myanmar rank
157th
Somalia rank
157th

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Myanmar
  • Somalia
00.20.40.6178919072025

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 0 against 0 in Somalia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Somalia ahead.

Myanmar ranks 157th and Somalia ranks 157th of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 8 and Somalia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Somalia Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0.3325 0 0.3325 Myanmar
1930s 0.4769 0 0.4769 Myanmar
1940s 0.1114 0 0.1114 Myanmar
1950s 0.3219 0.1138 0.2081 Myanmar
1960s 0.0892 0.3913 0.3021 Somalia
1970s 0.016 0 0.016 Myanmar
1980s 0.0246 0.0463 0.0217 Somalia
1990s 0.016 0.0045 0.0115 Myanmar
2000s 0 0 0
2010s 0.3929 0 0.3929 Myanmar
2020s 0.0988 0 0.0988 Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Myanmar or Somalia?
Myanmar, at 0 against 0 in Somalia as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Myanmar and Somalia?
0, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Somalia?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Myanmar and Somalia rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Myanmar ranks 157th and Somalia ranks 157th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.