Kenya vs Zambia: Free and Fair Elections Index

Kenya
0.493
in 2025
Zambia
0.461
in 2025
Kenya rank
95th
Zambia rank
98th

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Kenya
  • Zambia
00.20.40.6190019622025

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 0.493 against 0.461 in Zambia, a difference of 0.032.

That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Zambia ahead.

Kenya ranks 95th and Zambia ranks 98th of 176 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 7 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Zambia Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0
1920s 0.4529 0.0649 0.388 Kenya
1930s 0.3518 0.1783 0.1735 Kenya
1940s 0.4572 0.1727 0.2845 Kenya
1950s 0.4425 0.1818 0.2607 Kenya
1960s 0.3973 0.24 0.1573 Kenya
1970s 0.2619 0.2395 0.0224 Kenya
1980s 0.201 0.257 0.056 Zambia
1990s 0.1716 0.4261 0.2545 Zambia
2000s 0.3315 0.4541 0.1226 Zambia
2010s 0.3403 0.4177 0.0774 Zambia
2020s 0.4513 0.404 0.0473 Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Kenya or Zambia?
Kenya, at 0.493 against 0.461 in Zambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Kenya and Zambia?
0.032, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Zambia?
115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
How do Kenya and Zambia rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Kenya ranks 95th and Zambia ranks 98th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.