Jordan vs Mexico: Free and Fair Elections Index
Jordan
0.592
in 2025
Mexico
0.545
in 2025
Jordan rank
85th
Mexico rank
88th
Free and Fair Elections Index over time
- Jordan
- Mexico
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.592 against 0.545 in Mexico, a difference of 0.047.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Mexico ahead.
Jordan ranks 85th and Mexico ranks 88th of 176 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0 | 0.0556 | 0.0556 | Mexico |
| 1930s | 0 | 0.049 | 0.049 | Mexico |
| 1940s | 0.051 | 0.0555 | 0.0045 | Mexico |
| 1950s | 0.2643 | 0.0865 | 0.1778 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 0.214 | 0.1073 | 0.1067 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0.092 | 0.1208 | 0.0288 | Mexico |
| 1980s | 0.0065 | 0.1996 | 0.1931 | Mexico |
| 1990s | 0.3975 | 0.5787 | 0.1812 | Mexico |
| 2000s | 0.219 | 0.8045 | 0.5855 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0.4283 | 0.7567 | 0.3284 | Mexico |
| 2020s | 0.5093 | 0.6887 | 0.1793 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher free and fair elections index, Jordan or Mexico?
- Jordan, at 0.592 against 0.545 in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Jordan and Mexico?
- 0.047, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mexico?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Mexico rank globally for free and fair elections index?
- Jordan ranks 85th and Mexico ranks 88th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.