Israel vs Mauritius: Free and Fair Elections Index
Israel
0.873
in 2025
Mauritius
0.865
in 2025
Israel rank
43rd
Mauritius rank
45th
Free and Fair Elections Index over time
- Israel
- Mauritius
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0.873 against 0.865 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.008.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 98 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Mauritius ahead.
Israel ranks 43rd and Mauritius ranks 45th of 176 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 10 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.0407 | 0 | 0.0407 | Israel |
| 1910s | 0.2692 | 0 | 0.2692 | Israel |
| 1940s | 0.3865 | 0.539 | 0.1525 | Mauritius |
| 1950s | 0.8408 | 0.7619 | 0.0789 | Israel |
| 1960s | 0.8755 | 0.7707 | 0.1048 | Israel |
| 1970s | 0.8966 | 0.8562 | 0.0404 | Israel |
| 1980s | 0.9079 | 0.8887 | 0.0192 | Israel |
| 1990s | 0.9117 | 0.8904 | 0.0213 | Israel |
| 2000s | 0.9134 | 0.8876 | 0.0258 | Israel |
| 2010s | 0.8943 | 0.8774 | 0.0169 | Israel |
| 2020s | 0.8763 | 0.6225 | 0.2538 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher free and fair elections index, Israel or Mauritius?
- Israel, at 0.873 against 0.865 in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Israel and Mauritius?
- 0.008, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mauritius?
- 98 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Mauritius rank globally for free and fair elections index?
- Israel ranks 43rd and Mauritius ranks 45th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.