Iraq vs Tanzania: Free and Fair Elections Index

Iraq
0.372
in 2025
Tanzania
0.364
in 2025
Iraq rank
105th
Tanzania rank
106th

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Iraq
  • Tanzania
00.20.40.6178919072025

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 0.372 against 0.364 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.008.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 112 shared years of data; in 1914 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 105th and Tanzania ranks 106th of 176 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Tanzania Difference Ahead
1910s 0.2497 0 0.2497 Iraq
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0.1205 0.0596 0.0609 Iraq
1960s 0 0.5111 0.5111 Tanzania
1970s 0 0.4694 0.4694 Tanzania
1980s 0.0485 0.4652 0.4167 Tanzania
1990s 0.0507 0.5148 0.4641 Tanzania
2000s 0.2027 0.4177 0.215 Tanzania
2010s 0.3669 0.4632 0.0963 Tanzania
2020s 0.3715 0.3607 0.0108 Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Iraq or Tanzania?
Iraq, at 0.372 against 0.364 in Tanzania as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Iraq and Tanzania?
0.008, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Tanzania?
112 years are reported by both, from 1914 to 2025.
How do Iraq and Tanzania rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Iraq ranks 105th and Tanzania ranks 106th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.