Haiti vs Somalia: Free and Fair Elections Index

Haiti
0
in 2025
Somalia
0
in 2025
Haiti rank
157th
Somalia rank
157th

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Haiti
  • Somalia
00.20.40.6178919072025

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 0 against 0 in Somalia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Somalia ahead.

Haiti ranks 157th and Somalia ranks 157th of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 9 and Somalia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Somalia Difference Ahead
1900s 0.0254 0 0.0254 Haiti
1910s 0.0455 0 0.0455 Haiti
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0.0875 0 0.0875 Haiti
1940s 0.0904 0 0.0904 Haiti
1950s 0.0851 0.1138 0.0287 Somalia
1960s 0.042 0.3913 0.3493 Somalia
1970s 0.0397 0 0.0397 Haiti
1980s 0.0274 0.0463 0.0189 Somalia
1990s 0.2125 0.0045 0.208 Haiti
2000s 0.2633 0 0.2633 Haiti
2010s 0.2573 0 0.2573 Haiti
2020s 0.0577 0 0.0577 Haiti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Haiti or Somalia?
Haiti, at 0 against 0 in Somalia as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Haiti and Somalia?
0, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Somalia?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Haiti and Somalia rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Haiti ranks 157th and Somalia ranks 157th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.