Guinea vs Syria: Free and Fair Elections Index

Guinea
0.002
in 2025
Syria
0
in 2025
Guinea rank
156th
Syria rank
157th

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Guinea
  • Syria
00.10.20.30.4178919072025

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 0.002 against 0 in Syria, a difference of 0.002.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 124 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Syria ahead.

Guinea ranks 156th and Syria ranks 157th of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Syria in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Syria Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0.0407 0.0407 Syria
1910s 0 0.2198 0.2198 Syria
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0.0722 0.0815 0.0093 Syria
1950s 0.1402 0.2328 0.0926 Syria
1960s 0.0755 0.1343 0.0588 Syria
1970s 0.0555 0.0582 0.0027 Syria
1980s 0.0237 0.0622 0.0385 Syria
1990s 0.0433 0.0679 0.0246 Syria
2000s 0.0657 0.0529 0.0128 Guinea
2010s 0.2382 0.0096 0.2286 Guinea
2020s 0.0472 0 0.0472 Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Guinea or Syria?
Guinea, at 0.002 against 0 in Syria as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Guinea and Syria?
0.002, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Syria?
124 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Guinea and Syria rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Guinea ranks 156th and Syria ranks 157th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.