Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Free and Fair Elections Index

Guinea
0.002
in 2025
Saudi Arabia
0
in 2025
Guinea rank
156th
Saudi Arabia rank
157th

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Guinea
  • Saudi Arabia
00.10.20.3178919072025

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 0.002 against 0 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.002.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Guinea ranks 156th and Saudi Arabia ranks 157th of 176 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0.0722 0 0.0722 Guinea
1950s 0.1402 0 0.1402 Guinea
1960s 0.0755 0 0.0755 Guinea
1970s 0.0555 0 0.0555 Guinea
1980s 0.0237 0 0.0237 Guinea
1990s 0.0433 0 0.0433 Guinea
2000s 0.0657 0 0.0657 Guinea
2010s 0.2382 0 0.2382 Guinea
2020s 0.0472 0 0.0472 Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Guinea or Saudi Arabia?
Guinea, at 0.002 against 0 in Saudi Arabia as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Guinea and Saudi Arabia?
0.002, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Saudi Arabia?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Guinea and Saudi Arabia rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Guinea ranks 156th and Saudi Arabia ranks 157th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.