Georgia vs Togo: Free and Fair Elections Index

Georgia
0.32
in 2025
Togo
0.309
in 2025
Georgia rank
112th
Togo rank
114th

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Georgia
  • Togo
00.20.40.6180119132025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.32 against 0.309 in Togo, a difference of 0.011.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Togo ahead.

Georgia ranks 112th and Togo ranks 114th of 176 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Togo Difference Ahead
1910s 0.183 0 0.183 Georgia
1920s 0.3644 0 0.3644 Georgia
1930s 0.3516 0 0.3516 Georgia
1940s 0.2234 0.0548 0.1686 Georgia
1950s 0.2719 0.2102 0.0617 Georgia
1960s 0.19 0.1604 0.0296 Georgia
1970s 0.2878 0 0.2878 Georgia
1980s 0.2999 0.0478 0.2521 Georgia
1990s 0.1939 0.1471 0.0468 Georgia
2000s 0.3957 0.1446 0.2511 Georgia
2010s 0.5884 0.316 0.2724 Georgia
2020s 0.498 0.3158 0.1822 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Georgia or Togo?
Georgia, at 0.32 against 0.309 in Togo as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Georgia and Togo?
0.011, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Togo?
110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Togo rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Georgia ranks 112th and Togo ranks 114th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.