Georgia vs Lebanon: Free and Fair Elections Index
Georgia
0.32
in 2025
Lebanon
0.307
in 2025
Georgia rank
112th
Lebanon rank
115th
Free and Fair Elections Index over time
- Georgia
- Lebanon
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.32 against 0.307 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.013.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 112th and Lebanon ranks 115th of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 11 and Lebanon in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.342 | 0 | 0.342 | Georgia |
| 1920s | 0.3644 | 0 | 0.3644 | Georgia |
| 1930s | 0.3516 | 0 | 0.3516 | Georgia |
| 1940s | 0.2234 | 0.1801 | 0.0433 | Georgia |
| 1950s | 0.2719 | 0.2363 | 0.0356 | Georgia |
| 1960s | 0.19 | 0.3086 | 0.1186 | Lebanon |
| 1970s | 0.2878 | 0.2133 | 0.0745 | Georgia |
| 1980s | 0.2999 | 0.164 | 0.1359 | Georgia |
| 1990s | 0.1939 | 0.1311 | 0.0628 | Georgia |
| 2000s | 0.3957 | 0.278 | 0.1177 | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.5884 | 0.395 | 0.1934 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.498 | 0.3238 | 0.1742 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher free and fair elections index, Georgia or Lebanon?
- Georgia, at 0.32 against 0.307 in Lebanon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Georgia and Lebanon?
- 0.013, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Lebanon?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Lebanon rank globally for free and fair elections index?
- Georgia ranks 112th and Lebanon ranks 115th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.