Fiji vs United Arab Emirates: Free and Fair Elections Index

Fiji
0.54
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
0.543
in 2025
Fiji rank
90th
United Arab Emirates rank
89th

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Fiji
  • United Arab Emirates
00.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 0.543 against 0.54 in Fiji, a difference of 0.003.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Fiji ahead.

Fiji ranks 90th and United Arab Emirates ranks 89th of 176 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 4 and United Arab Emirates in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1970s 0.7044 0 0.7044 Fiji
1980s 0.5195 0 0.5195 Fiji
1990s 0.5397 0 0.5397 Fiji
2000s 0.3807 0.1128 0.2679 Fiji
2010s 0.2474 0.4699 0.2225 United Arab Emirates
2020s 0.5027 0.5317 0.029 United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Fiji or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 0.543 against 0.54 in Fiji as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Fiji and United Arab Emirates?
0.003, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and United Arab Emirates?
55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
How do Fiji and United Arab Emirates rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Fiji ranks 90th and United Arab Emirates ranks 89th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.