Croatia vs Israel: Free and Fair Elections Index

Croatia
0.875
in 2025
Israel
0.873
in 2025
Croatia rank
41st
Israel rank
43rd

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Croatia
  • Israel
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0.875 against 0.873 in Israel, a difference of 0.002.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 78 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 41st and Israel ranks 43rd of 176 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Israel in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Israel Difference Ahead
1940s 0.081 0.3865 0.3055 Israel
1950s 0.1132 0.8408 0.7276 Israel
1960s 0.1115 0.8755 0.764 Israel
1970s 0.1008 0.8966 0.7958 Israel
1980s 0.112 0.9079 0.7959 Israel
1990s 0.3565 0.9117 0.5552 Israel
2000s 0.8372 0.9134 0.0762 Israel
2010s 0.9203 0.8943 0.026 Croatia
2020s 0.9153 0.8763 0.039 Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Croatia or Israel?
Croatia, at 0.875 against 0.873 in Israel as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Croatia and Israel?
0.002, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Israel?
78 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Israel rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Croatia ranks 41st and Israel ranks 43rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.