Comoros vs Serbia: Free and Fair Elections Index
Comoros
0.183
in 2025
Serbia
0.212
in 2025
Comoros rank
133rd
Serbia rank
130th
Free and Fair Elections Index over time
- Comoros
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.212 against 0.183 in Comoros, a difference of 0.029.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Serbia ahead.
Comoros ranks 133rd and Serbia ranks 130th of 176 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0.2895 | 0.2895 | Serbia |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.243 | 0.243 | Serbia |
| 1940s | 0 | 0.081 | 0.081 | Serbia |
| 1950s | 0 | 0.1132 | 0.1132 | Serbia |
| 1960s | 0 | 0.1115 | 0.1115 | Serbia |
| 1970s | 0.0763 | 0.1008 | 0.0245 | Serbia |
| 1980s | 0.1314 | 0.112 | 0.0194 | Comoros |
| 1990s | 0.2798 | 0.2228 | 0.057 | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.3042 | 0.6043 | 0.3001 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.3195 | 0.5097 | 0.1902 | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.1007 | 0.2953 | 0.1947 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher free and fair elections index, Comoros or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0.212 against 0.183 in Comoros as of 2025.
- What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Comoros and Serbia?
- 0.029, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Serbia?
- 94 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Serbia rank globally for free and fair elections index?
- Comoros ranks 133rd and Serbia ranks 130th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.