Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Viet Nam: Free and Fair Elections Index
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.511
in 2025
Viet Nam
0.527
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
93rd
Viet Nam rank
91st
Free and Fair Elections Index over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 0.527 against 0.511 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.016.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Viet Nam ranks 91st of 176 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Viet Nam in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.112 | 0.5613 | 0.4493 | Viet Nam |
| 1980s | 0.112 | 0.5315 | 0.4195 | Viet Nam |
| 1990s | 0.2359 | 0.5132 | 0.2773 | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 0.6912 | 0.4749 | 0.2163 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 0.5379 | 0.4772 | 0.0607 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 0.5198 | 0.5172 | 0.0027 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher free and fair elections index, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 0.527 against 0.511 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Viet Nam?
- 0.016, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Viet Nam?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Viet Nam rank globally for free and fair elections index?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Viet Nam ranks 91st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.