Barbados vs Israel: Free and Fair Elections Index

Barbados
0.875
in 2025
Israel
0.873
in 2025
Barbados rank
41st
Israel rank
43rd

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Barbados
  • Israel
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.875 against 0.873 in Israel, a difference of 0.002.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 98 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Israel ahead.

Barbados ranks 41st and Israel ranks 43rd of 176 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 10.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Israel Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0.0407 0.0407 Israel
1910s 0 0.2692 0.2692 Israel
1940s 0 0.3865 0.3865 Israel
1950s 0.5942 0.8408 0.2466 Israel
1960s 0.7676 0.8755 0.1079 Israel
1970s 0.7989 0.8966 0.0977 Israel
1980s 0.8061 0.9079 0.1018 Israel
1990s 0.83 0.9117 0.0817 Israel
2000s 0.8478 0.9134 0.0656 Israel
2010s 0.8612 0.8943 0.0331 Israel
2020s 0.8775 0.8763 0.0012 Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Barbados or Israel?
Barbados, at 0.875 against 0.873 in Israel as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Barbados and Israel?
0.002, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Israel?
98 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Barbados and Israel rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Barbados ranks 41st and Israel ranks 43rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.