Bangladesh vs Qatar: Free and Fair Elections Index

Bangladesh
0
in 2025
Qatar
0
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
157th
Qatar rank
157th

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Qatar
00.20.40.6178919072025

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0 against 0 in Qatar, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Qatar ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 157th and Qatar ranks 157th of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 8 and Qatar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Qatar Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0.4322 0 0.4322 Bangladesh
1930s 0.537 0 0.537 Bangladesh
1940s 0.422 0 0.422 Bangladesh
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0.145 0 0.145 Bangladesh
1980s 0.1439 0 0.1439 Bangladesh
1990s 0.4833 0 0.4833 Bangladesh
2000s 0.3609 0 0.3609 Bangladesh
2010s 0.2536 0 0.2536 Bangladesh
2020s 0.1093 0.223 0.1137 Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Bangladesh or Qatar?
Bangladesh, at 0 against 0 in Qatar as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Bangladesh and Qatar?
0, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Qatar?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Qatar rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Bangladesh ranks 157th and Qatar ranks 157th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.