Bangladesh vs Niger: Free and Fair Elections Index

Bangladesh
0
in 2025
Niger
0
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
157th
Niger rank
157th

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Niger
00.20.40.6178919072025

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0 against 0 in Niger, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 157th and Niger ranks 157th of 176 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 6 and Niger in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Niger Difference Ahead
1920s 0.4748 0 0.4748 Bangladesh
1930s 0.537 0 0.537 Bangladesh
1940s 0.422 0.0198 0.4022 Bangladesh
1950s 0 0.0682 0.0682 Niger
1960s 0 0.2803 0.2803 Niger
1970s 0.145 0.1015 0.0435 Bangladesh
1980s 0.1439 0.0018 0.1421 Bangladesh
1990s 0.4833 0.3667 0.1166 Bangladesh
2000s 0.3609 0.5382 0.1773 Niger
2010s 0.2536 0.4974 0.2438 Niger
2020s 0.1093 0.264 0.1547 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Bangladesh or Niger?
Bangladesh, at 0 against 0 in Niger as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Bangladesh and Niger?
0, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Niger?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Niger rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Bangladesh ranks 157th and Niger ranks 157th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.