Angola vs Mauritania: Free and Fair Elections Index

Angola
0.293
in 2025
Mauritania
0.288
in 2025
Angola rank
120th
Mauritania rank
121st

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Angola
  • Mauritania
00.10.20.30.40.5190019622025

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.293 against 0.288 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.005.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 122 shared years of data; in 1904 it was Mauritania ahead.

Angola ranks 120th and Mauritania ranks 121st of 176 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Mauritania Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0.1259 0.1259 Mauritania
1950s 0 0.3843 0.3843 Mauritania
1960s 0 0.27 0.27 Mauritania
1970s 0 0.1678 0.1678 Mauritania
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0.0017 0.1056 0.1039 Mauritania
2000s 0.028 0.173 0.145 Mauritania
2010s 0.2157 0.4072 0.1915 Mauritania
2020s 0.2755 0.3605 0.085 Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Angola or Mauritania?
Angola, at 0.293 against 0.288 in Mauritania as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Angola and Mauritania?
0.005, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Mauritania?
122 years are reported by both, from 1904 to 2025.
How do Angola and Mauritania rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Angola ranks 120th and Mauritania ranks 121st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.