Afghanistan vs Niger: Free and Fair Elections Index

Afghanistan
0
in 2025
Niger
0
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
157th
Niger rank
157th

Free and Fair Elections Index over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Niger
00.20.40.6178919072025

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 0 against 0 in Niger, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Niger ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 157th and Niger ranks 157th of 176 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 4 and Niger in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Niger Difference Ahead
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0.0906 0 0.0906 Afghanistan
1940s 0.0991 0.0198 0.0793 Afghanistan
1950s 0.122 0.0682 0.0538 Afghanistan
1960s 0.1597 0.2803 0.1206 Niger
1970s 0.0694 0.1015 0.0321 Niger
1980s 0.0101 0.0018 0.0083 Afghanistan
1990s 0.0167 0.3667 0.35 Niger
2000s 0.1082 0.5382 0.43 Niger
2010s 0.1601 0.4974 0.3373 Niger
2020s 0.0402 0.264 0.2238 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher free and fair elections index, Afghanistan or Niger?
Afghanistan, at 0 against 0 in Niger as of 2025.
What is the difference in free and fair elections index between Afghanistan and Niger?
0, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Niger?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Afghanistan and Niger rank globally for free and fair elections index?
Afghanistan ranks 157th and Niger ranks 157th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Free and Fair Elections Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Free and Fair Elections Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,402 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the election management body is autonomous and has enough staff and resources.