Cuba vs Zambia: Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square

Cuba
1,550 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1,487 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
107th
Zambia rank
108th

Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square over time

  • Cuba
  • Zambia
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 1,550 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre against 1,487 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 63 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Cuba ranks 107th and Zambia ranks 108th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 35.42 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 195.8 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 160.38 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 562.38 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 300.9 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 261.48 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 455.57 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 692 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 236.43 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 679.46 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 1,107 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 427.77 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 976.78 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 2,246 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 1,269 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 5,930 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 1,340 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 4,590 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 2,292 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 1,345 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 947.3 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square, Cuba or Zambia?
Cuba, at 1,550 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre against 1,487 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square between Cuba and Zambia?
63 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Zambia rank globally for foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square?
Cuba ranks 107th and Zambia ranks 108th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zambia: Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-aid-received-as-grants-and-concessional-loans-per-square-kilometre/cuba/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-aid-received-as-grants-and-concessional-loans-per-square-kilometre/cuba/zambia/">Cuba vs Zambia: Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 8,567 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.