Japan vs United States of America: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail

Japan
25.15
in 2015
United States of America
21.16
in 2015
Japan rank
3rd
United States of America rank
4th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail over time

  • Japan
  • United States of America
510152025199020022015

How they compare

Japan currently reports 25.15 against 21.16 in United States of America, a difference of 3.99.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.2 times United States of America's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was United States of America ahead.

Japan ranks 3rd and United States of America ranks 4th of 193 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 2 and United States of America in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 6.92 9.53 2.61 United States of America
2000s 18.99 18.86 0.1236 Japan
2010s 24.19 21.53 2.66 Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - retail, Japan or United States of America?
Japan, at 25.15 against 21.16 in United States of America as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - retail between Japan and United States of America?
3.99, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and United States of America?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Japan and United States of America rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - retail?
Japan ranks 3rd and United States of America ranks 4th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs United States of America: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-retail/japan/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-retail/japan/united-states/">Japan vs United States of America: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
193 places, 5,004 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).