Guatemala vs Republic of Moldova: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail

Guatemala
2.31
in 2015
Republic of Moldova
2.48
in 2015
Guatemala rank
77th
Republic of Moldova rank
76th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail over time

  • Guatemala
  • Republic of Moldova
01234199020022015

How they compare

Republic of Moldova currently reports 2.48 against 2.31 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.17.

That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.

Guatemala ranks 77th and Republic of Moldova ranks 76th of 193 countries.

Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3318 2.19 1.86 Republic of Moldova
2000s 1.77 1.84 0.0651 Republic of Moldova
2010s 2.36 2.44 0.0834 Republic of Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - retail, Guatemala or Republic of Moldova?
Republic of Moldova, at 2.48 against 2.31 in Guatemala as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - retail between Guatemala and Republic of Moldova?
0.17, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Republic of Moldova?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Guatemala and Republic of Moldova rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - retail?
Guatemala ranks 77th and Republic of Moldova ranks 76th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Republic of Moldova: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-retail/guatemala/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-retail/guatemala/moldova/">Guatemala vs Republic of Moldova: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Retail
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
193 places, 5,004 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).