Central African Republic vs China: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Production

Central African Republic
48.23
in 2015
China
47.85
in 2015
Central African Republic rank
70th
China rank
72nd

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Production over time

  • Central African Republic
  • China
0204060199020022015

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 48.23 against 47.85 in China, a difference of 0.38.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 70th and China ranks 72nd of 201 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic China Difference Ahead
1990s 30.87 61.87 31 China
2000s 40.83 54.23 13.4 China
2010s 47.35 47.7 0.3461 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - production, Central African Republic or China?
Central African Republic, at 48.23 against 47.85 in China as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - production between Central African Republic and China?
0.38, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and China?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Central African Republic and China rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - production?
Central African Republic ranks 70th and China ranks 72nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs China: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Production. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-production/central-african-republic/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-production/central-african-republic/china/">Central African Republic vs China: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Production
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
201 places, 5,226 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).