Cuba vs Eswatini: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing
Cuba
2.58
in 2015
Eswatini
2.33
in 2015
Cuba rank
91st
Eswatini rank
94th
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing over time
- Cuba
- Eswatini
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 2.58 against 2.33 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.25.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Cuba ranks 91st and Eswatini ranks 94th of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.09 | 7.12 | 4.02 | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 2.6 | 7.56 | 4.96 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 2.39 | 2.31 | 0.0771 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing, Cuba or Eswatini?
- Cuba, at 2.58 against 2.33 in Eswatini as of 2015.
- What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing between Cuba and Eswatini?
- 0.25, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eswatini?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Cuba and Eswatini rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing?
- Cuba ranks 91st and Eswatini ranks 94th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.