Aruba vs Slovenia: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing
Aruba
4.34
in 2015
Slovenia
4.2
in 2015
Aruba rank
61st
Slovenia rank
62nd
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing over time
- Aruba
- Slovenia
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 4.34 against 4.2 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.14.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Slovenia ahead.
Aruba ranks 61st and Slovenia ranks 62nd of 199 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.91 | 8.5 | 4.59 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 3.37 | 6.84 | 3.47 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 4.29 | 4.1 | 0.1809 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing, Aruba or Slovenia?
- Aruba, at 4.34 against 4.2 in Slovenia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing between Aruba and Slovenia?
- 0.14, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Slovenia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Aruba and Slovenia rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing?
- Aruba ranks 61st and Slovenia ranks 62nd of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.