Aruba vs North Macedonia: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing
Aruba
4.34
in 2015
North Macedonia
4.51
in 2015
Aruba rank
61st
North Macedonia rank
60th
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing over time
- Aruba
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 4.51 against 4.34 in Aruba, a difference of 0.17.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Aruba ranks 61st and North Macedonia ranks 60th of 199 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.91 | 5.55 | 1.64 | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 3.37 | 5.86 | 2.49 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 4.29 | 4.9 | 0.6114 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing, Aruba or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 4.51 against 4.34 in Aruba as of 2015.
- What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing between Aruba and North Macedonia?
- 0.17, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and North Macedonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Aruba and North Macedonia rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing?
- Aruba ranks 61st and North Macedonia ranks 60th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.