Aruba vs Gibraltar: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing
Aruba
4.34
in 2015
Gibraltar
4.12
in 2015
Aruba rank
61st
Gibraltar rank
64th
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing over time
- Aruba
- Gibraltar
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 4.34 against 4.12 in Gibraltar, a difference of 0.22.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Gibraltar's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gibraltar ahead.
Aruba ranks 61st and Gibraltar ranks 64th of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Gibraltar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Gibraltar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.91 | 3.78 | 0.1286 | Aruba |
| 2000s | 3.37 | 3.79 | 0.422 | Gibraltar |
| 2010s | 4.29 | 4.06 | 0.2286 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing, Aruba or Gibraltar?
- Aruba, at 4.34 against 4.12 in Gibraltar as of 2015.
- What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing between Aruba and Gibraltar?
- 0.22, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Gibraltar?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Aruba and Gibraltar rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - processing?
- Aruba ranks 61st and Gibraltar ranks 64th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.