Trinidad and Tobago vs Turkmenistan: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging

Trinidad and Tobago
3.95
in 2015
Turkmenistan
4.03
in 2015
Trinidad and Tobago rank
68th
Turkmenistan rank
65th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging over time

  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Turkmenistan
0246199020022015

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 4.03 against 3.95 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.08.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Trinidad and Tobago ranks 68th and Turkmenistan ranks 65th of 203 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Trinidad and Tobago averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Trinidad and Tobago Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 4.95 4.34 0.6056 Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 4.26 4.62 0.3573 Turkmenistan
2010s 4.03 3.98 0.0538 Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging, Trinidad and Tobago or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 4.03 against 3.95 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging between Trinidad and Tobago and Turkmenistan?
0.08, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Turkmenistan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Trinidad and Tobago and Turkmenistan rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging?
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 68th and Turkmenistan ranks 65th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trinidad and Tobago vs Turkmenistan: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-packaging/trinidad-and-tobago/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-packaging/trinidad-and-tobago/turkmenistan/">Trinidad and Tobago vs Turkmenistan: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 5,278 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).