Republic of Korea vs Taiwan, China: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging

Republic of Korea
16.31
in 2015
Taiwan, China
17.23
in 2015
Republic of Korea rank
5th
Taiwan, China rank
3rd

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging over time

  • Republic of Korea
  • Taiwan, China
0510152025199020022015

How they compare

Taiwan, China currently reports 17.23 against 16.31 in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.92.

That makes Taiwan, China's figure about 1.1 times Republic of Korea's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Taiwan, China has been ahead every year.

Republic of Korea ranks 5th and Taiwan, China ranks 3rd of 203 countries.

Taiwan, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Korea Taiwan, China Difference Ahead
1990s 15.81 22.52 6.71 Taiwan, China
2000s 16.32 19.14 2.82 Taiwan, China
2010s 16.32 19.03 2.71 Taiwan, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging, Republic of Korea or Taiwan, China?
Taiwan, China, at 17.23 against 16.31 in Republic of Korea as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging between Republic of Korea and Taiwan, China?
0.92, with Taiwan, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Taiwan, China?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Republic of Korea and Taiwan, China rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging?
Republic of Korea ranks 5th and Taiwan, China ranks 3rd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Korea vs Taiwan, China: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-packaging/korea-rep/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-packaging/korea-rep/taiwan/">Republic of Korea vs Taiwan, China: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 5,278 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).