Dominican Republic vs Morocco: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging

Dominican Republic
6.52
in 2015
Morocco
6.15
in 2015
Dominican Republic rank
41st
Morocco rank
44th

Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Morocco
02468199020022015

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 6.52 against 6.15 in Morocco, a difference of 0.37.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Morocco ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 41st and Morocco ranks 44th of 203 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Morocco Difference Ahead
1990s 0.8671 0.9784 0.1113 Morocco
2000s 4.36 3.89 0.4732 Dominican Republic
2010s 5.62 6.42 0.803 Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging, Dominican Republic or Morocco?
Dominican Republic, at 6.52 against 6.15 in Morocco as of 2015.
What is the difference in food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging between Dominican Republic and Morocco?
0.37, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Morocco?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Dominican Republic and Morocco rank globally for food ghg emissions by system stage (share of total) - packaging?
Dominican Republic ranks 41st and Morocco ranks 44th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021), published as Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Morocco: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging. Statizoid, drawing on Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-packaging/dominican-republic/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/food-ghg-emissions-by-system-stage-share-of-total-packaging/dominican-republic/morocco/">Dominican Republic vs Morocco: Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food GHG emissions by system stage (Share of total) - Packaging
Source
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. and Leip, A. EDGAR-FOOD data. Figshare, doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (2021)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 5,278 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food GHG emissions disaggregated by system stage are generated from EDGAR-FOOD, a global emission inventory of GHGs from the food systems. EDGAR-FOOD has been developed to aid the understanding of the activities underlying the energy demand and use, agriculture and land use change emissions associated with the production, distribution, consumption and disposal of food through the various stages and sectors of the composite global food system. These data were complemented with data from the FAOSTAT database on GHG emissions from land use related to agriculture (FAO, 2020). EDGAR-FOOD represents the first database consistently covering each stage of the food chain for all countries with yearly frequency for the period 1990-2015. Details regarding the methodology applied are available in Crippa et al. (2021).