Israel vs Latvia: Financial market — Real effective exchange rates - CPI based
Financial market — Real effective exchange rates - CPI based over time
- Israel
- Latvia
How they compare
Israel currently reports 111.04 Index against 110.43 Index in Latvia, a difference of 0.61 Index.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 5th and Latvia ranks 4th of 35 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 109.1 Index | 82.79 Index | 26.31 Index | Israel |
| 2000s | 94.65 Index | 91.91 Index | 2.74 Index | Israel |
| 2010s | 100.16 Index | 98.3 Index | 1.86 Index | Israel |
| 2020s | 109.66 Index | 107.74 Index | 1.92 Index | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial market — real effective exchange rates - cpi based, Israel or Latvia?
- Israel, at 111.04 Index against 110.43 Index in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in financial market — real effective exchange rates - cpi based between Israel and Latvia?
- 0.61 Index, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Latvia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Latvia rank globally for financial market — real effective exchange rates - cpi based?
- Israel ranks 5th and Latvia ranks 4th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Financial market — Real effective exchange rates - CPI based. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial Indicators aim to capture in quantitative terms an important but heterogeneous and fast evolving area. Key factors driving this change are: globalisation of the financial markets; maturing of national financial markets and therefore the structure of these markets required to service their needs; increased sophistication of the actors in these markets; rapid technological change; and evolving regulatory frameworks. Financial institutions react and adapt to these conditions by changing their strategies; by specialising, by diversifying or concentrating their activities, and by extending through mergers and acquisitions. As a consequence, there is almost constant evolution in the institutional structures in which financial markets operate.OECD statistics contactStatistics and Data Directorate