Ecuador vs Namibia: Females, as a share of public paid employees by wage quintile
Ecuador
0.5158
in 2017
Namibia
0.5081
in 2015
Ecuador rank
44th
Namibia rank
45th
Females, as a share of public paid employees by wage quintile over time
- Ecuador
- Namibia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.5158 against 0.5081 in Namibia, a difference of 0.0077.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Namibia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 45th of 59 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4607 | 0.4638 | 0.0032 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.5054 | 0.4977 | 0.0078 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher females, as a share of public paid employees by wage quintile, Ecuador or Namibia?
- Ecuador, at 0.5158 against 0.5081 in Namibia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in females, as a share of public paid employees by wage quintile between Ecuador and Namibia?
- 0.0077, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for females, as a share of public paid employees by wage quintile?
- Ecuador ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 45th of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Females, as a share of public paid employees by wage quintile: Quintile 3. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.