Australia vs South Africa: Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group
Australia
0.6396
in 2015
South Africa
0.6535
in 2019
Australia rank
22nd
South Africa rank
19th
Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group over time
- Australia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.6535 against 0.6396 in Australia, a difference of 0.0139.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2003 it was South Africa ahead.
Australia ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 19th of 59 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5878 | 0.6245 | 0.0366 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 0.6602 | 0.6585 | 0.0018 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group, Australia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.6535 against 0.6396 in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group between Australia and South Africa?
- 0.0139, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Australia and South Africa rank globally for females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group?
- Australia ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 19th of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group: Technicians. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.