Australia vs Belgium: Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group
Australia
0.6396
in 2015
Belgium
0.6453
in 2018
Australia rank
22nd
Belgium rank
20th
Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group over time
- Australia
- Belgium
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.6453 against 0.6396 in Australia, a difference of 0.0057.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Belgium ahead.
Australia ranks 22nd and Belgium ranks 20th of 59 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Belgium in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.6379 | 0.6771 | 0.0391 | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0.6559 | 0.6082 | 0.0477 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group, Australia or Belgium?
- Belgium, at 0.6453 against 0.6396 in Australia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group between Australia and Belgium?
- 0.0057, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belgium?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Belgium rank globally for females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group?
- Australia ranks 22nd and Belgium ranks 20th of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group: Technicians. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.