Australia vs Malta: Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group
Australia
0.3833
in 2015
Malta
0.4874
in 2018
Australia rank
43rd
Malta rank
40th
Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group over time
- Australia
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.4874 against 0.3833 in Australia, a difference of 0.1041.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.3 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 43rd and Malta ranks 40th of 59 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5275 | 0.3639 | 0.1636 | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.3869 | 0.4835 | 0.0966 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group, Australia or Malta?
- Malta, at 0.4874 against 0.3833 in Australia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group between Australia and Malta?
- 0.1041, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Malta?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Malta rank globally for females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group?
- Australia ranks 43rd and Malta ranks 40th of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group: Elementary occupation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.