Peru vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group
Peru
0.535
in 2021
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.5315
in 2020
Peru rank
50th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
51st
Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group over time
- Peru
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.535 against 0.5315 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0035.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 50th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 51st of 58 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5596 | 0.5017 | 0.0579 | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.5182 | 0.6773 | 0.159 | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group, Peru or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Peru, at 0.535 against 0.5315 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2021.
- What is the difference in females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group between Peru and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.0035, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2014.
- How do Peru and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group?
- Peru ranks 50th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 51st of 58 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group: Clerks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.