Australia vs Chile: Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group
Australia
0.7263
in 2015
Chile
0.7274
in 2015
Australia rank
28th
Chile rank
27th
Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group over time
- Australia
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.7274 against 0.7263 in Australia, a difference of 0.0011.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 28th and Chile ranks 27th of 58 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.7475 | 0.671 | 0.0765 | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.7248 | 0.7368 | 0.012 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group, Australia or Chile?
- Chile, at 0.7274 against 0.7263 in Australia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group between Australia and Chile?
- 0.0011, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chile?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Chile rank globally for females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group?
- Australia ranks 28th and Chile ranks 27th of 58 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Females, as a share of public paid employees by occupational group: Clerks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.