Australia vs Latvia: Females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group
Australia
0.5742
in 2015
Latvia
0.5295
in 2018
Australia rank
2nd
Latvia rank
5th
Females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group over time
- Australia
- Latvia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.5742 against 0.5295 in Latvia, a difference of 0.0447.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Latvia ahead.
Australia ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 5th of 58 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4806 | 0.6196 | 0.139 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.5466 | 0.5533 | 0.0067 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group, Australia or Latvia?
- Australia, at 0.5742 against 0.5295 in Latvia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group between Australia and Latvia?
- 0.0447, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group?
- Australia ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 5th of 58 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group: Technicians. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.