Australia vs Zambia: Females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group
Australia
0.3918
in 2015
Zambia
0.3889
in 2014
Australia rank
37th
Zambia rank
40th
Females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group over time
- Australia
- Zambia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.3918 against 0.3889 in Zambia, a difference of 0.0029.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 37th and Zambia ranks 40th of 59 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3562 | 0.3042 | 0.0521 | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.3625 | 0.3518 | 0.0107 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group, Australia or Zambia?
- Australia, at 0.3918 against 0.3889 in Zambia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group between Australia and Zambia?
- 0.0029, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zambia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Zambia rank globally for females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group?
- Australia ranks 37th and Zambia ranks 40th of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group: Elementary occupation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.