Australia vs Peru: Females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group
Australia
0.3918
in 2015
Peru
0.3937
in 2016
Australia rank
37th
Peru rank
35th
Females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group over time
- Australia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.3937 against 0.3918 in Australia, a difference of 0.0019.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Peru ahead.
Australia ranks 37th and Peru ranks 35th of 59 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4017 | 0.4017 | 0.0001 | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.3575 | 0.397 | 0.0395 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group, Australia or Peru?
- Peru, at 0.3937 against 0.3918 in Australia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group between Australia and Peru?
- 0.0019, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Peru rank globally for females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group?
- Australia ranks 37th and Peru ranks 35th of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group: Elementary occupation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.