Australia vs Latvia: Females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group
Australia
0.6584
in 2015
Latvia
0.672
in 2018
Australia rank
19th
Latvia rank
16th
Females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group over time
- Australia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.672 against 0.6584 in Australia, a difference of 0.0136.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 19th and Latvia ranks 16th of 57 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.6923 | 0.827 | 0.1347 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.6479 | 0.7725 | 0.1246 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group, Australia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.672 against 0.6584 in Australia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group between Australia and Latvia?
- 0.0136, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
- How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group?
- Australia ranks 19th and Latvia ranks 16th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Females, as a share of private paid employees by occupational group: Clerks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.