Ecuador vs Romania: Female in non-agricultural employment, aged 15-64, urban
Ecuador
0.9%
in 2021
Romania
0.9%
in 2016
Ecuador rank
68th
Romania rank
69th
Female in non-agricultural employment, aged 15-64, urban over time
- Ecuador
- Romania
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.9% against 0.9% in Romania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 68th and Romania ranks 69th of 88 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.0% | 0.9% | 0.0% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.0% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher female in non-agricultural employment, aged 15-64, urban, Ecuador or Romania?
- Ecuador, at 0.9% against 0.9% in Romania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in female in non-agricultural employment, aged 15-64, urban between Ecuador and Romania?
- 0.0%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Romania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2016.
- How do Ecuador and Romania rank globally for female in non-agricultural employment, aged 15-64, urban?
- Ecuador ranks 68th and Romania ranks 69th of 88 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Female in non-agricultural employment, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban employed female population in working age). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.