Serbia vs Tuvalu: FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP
Serbia
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Tuvalu
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Serbia rank
83rd
Tuvalu rank
80th
FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP over time
- Serbia
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Serbia, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 83rd and Tuvalu ranks 80th of 205 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp, Serbia or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp between Serbia and Tuvalu?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tuvalu?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Tuvalu rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp?
- Serbia ranks 83rd and Tuvalu ranks 80th of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FAO projections of arable land divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.