Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP

Kiribati
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Kiribati rank
34th
Zimbabwe rank
36th

FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP over time

  • Kiribati
  • Zimbabwe
00.0010.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 36th of 205 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0016 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0011 hectares per US$ of GDP Kiribati
1980s 0.0012 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP Kiribati
1990s 0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP Kiribati
2000s 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0007 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp, Kiribati or Zimbabwe?
Kiribati, at 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp between Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Zimbabwe rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp?
Kiribati ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 36th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-unit-of-gdp/kiribati/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/fao-projections-of-arable-land-per-unit-of-gdp/kiribati/zimbabwe/">Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP
Unit
hectares per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 10,728 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

FAO projections of arable land divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.