Guam vs Norway: FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP
Guam
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Norway
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Guam rank
172nd
Norway rank
170th
FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP over time
- Guam
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Guam, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.4 times Guam's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Norway ahead.
Guam ranks 172nd and Norway ranks 170th of 205 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Norway |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp, Guam or Norway?
- Norway, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Guam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp between Guam and Norway?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Norway?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Guam and Norway rank globally for fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp?
- Guam ranks 172nd and Norway ranks 170th of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FAO projections of arable land divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.